top of page
  • N.P.J.M. Kreté-Marres

Limiting alimony and pay back obligation alimony

Click here for the verdict. 

Publication Court of Appeal the Hague ruling of 18-11-2015 Client N. Kreté: The man Essence: Changing alimony that has been limited and the obligation for the woman to pay back the spousal alimony the man has paid. ECLI:NL:GHDHA:2015:3767 

The Court of Appeal ruled that a disappointed expectation of the future, as described above, is not in itself such a change of circumstances and the remaining by the woman to the point raised circumstances are not such exceptional circumstances that an extension of the fixed maintenance period under Article 1: 401lid2 BW is justified. The request by the man to squash the contested decision is approved. The woman is also ordered to repay the alimony overpaid by the man as of August 25, 2014.

Recente blogposts

Alles weergeven


PAUL DAEMEN, MSc., CCIM, CIPS, CRS, Global industry consultant: “One of the best attorneys I worked with in the Netherlands and has a lot of know how on Dutch estate law. THANK YOU Nicole”


bottom of page